You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
I Luk Kim 7a2001a4fa Add v6new.25: OME risk halved — paper BT +94.38% beats v6.29 +93.60%
Based on paper backtest loss analysis (not backtester SQS optimization):
- OME engines contribute only +$1,405 on 8 trades but generate most losses
- Halving OME per_trade_risk reduces loss magnitude without removing trades
- Paper BT: +94.38% vs v6.29 +93.60%, MaxDD 4.07% vs 4.60%
- WFV: 100% positive fold rate (worst +0.02%)
- RM worst: -0.88%, OOT worst: -0.33%
- SQS: 62.9 (vs v6.29 62.8)

This is the first strategy improvement validated by BOTH backtester SQS
AND paper backtest return, using the now-unified engine systems.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5 months ago
..
LEADERBOARD.md Add v6new.25: OME risk halved — paper BT +94.38% beats v6.29 +93.60% 5 months ago
attention_probe_20260317.md Add attention client and continue PEAD research 5 months ago
experiment_registry.json Add attention-aware PEAD caps and promote step75 5 months ago
improvement_journal.jsonl Add v6new.25: OME risk halved — paper BT +94.38% beats v6.29 +93.60% 5 months ago