You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
fithia2/journal/attention_probe_20260317.md

2.5 KiB

Free Attention Probe

Date: 2026-03-17

Goal:

  • Verify that free historical attention/news proxies can be fetched for old events.
  • Run a short-sample sanity check before building anything into Stock Oracle.

Sources tested:

  • Wikimedia pageviews for historical attention spikes
  • GDELT Doc API for spot-check historical news article counts

Method:

  • Start from data/datasets/snapshots/midcap-filtered/test.parquet
  • Restrict to earnings_release
  • Join ticker / issuer_name from local Postgres
  • Keep only names that are not obvious {TICKER} Corporation placeholders
  • Resolve a Wikipedia article title from issuer name
  • Compute pageview_spike = event_day_views / median(last_10_pre_event_views)
  • Compare against signed continuation:
    • signed_cont_3d = sign(reaction_day_return) * fwd_return_3d
    • signed_cont_5d = sign(reaction_day_return) * fwd_return_5d

Probe run:

  • command:
    • python -m apps.tools.free_attention_probe --limit 30 --gdelt-limit 5
  • output csv:
    • data/research/free_attention_probe_test_sample.csv

Results:

  • Sampled 30 non-generic test-split earnings events
  • Resolved 22 rows with usable Wikipedia pageviews
  • Raw sample:
    • median pageview spike 1.226x
    • high-spike group signed 3D continuation mean +0.0672
    • low-spike group signed 3D continuation mean +0.0186
    • high-spike group signed 5D continuation mean +0.0693
    • low-spike group signed 5D continuation mean +0.0458
    • corr(pageview_spike, signed_cont_3d) +0.2646
    • corr(pageview_spike, signed_cont_5d) -0.1075
  • After filtering to higher-confidence mappings and excluding obviously bad article matches, the broad signal became inconclusive.
  • Negative-reaction subset looked more promising than the full sample on 5D continuation, but sample size was too small to trust.

GDELT spot-check:

  • Historical fetch works.
  • Exact-phrase matching is fragile without a better company-name resolver.
  • In the small spot-check, valid 3-day article counts were observed for some names, but coverage was too patchy for immediate use as-is.

Conclusion:

  • Free historical attention/news data is usable for short-window research.
  • Wikimedia pageviews is immediately practical.
  • GDELT is viable, but only after better issuer-name normalization and article/entity resolution.
  • Current evidence does not justify adding raw pageview spike directly to strategy scoring yet.
  • The most promising next test is a conditional filter on downside earnings reactions, not a global attention overlay.